Perioperative Risk Stratification and Modification

  • Lewis Matthews
    Corresponding author. Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
    Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom

    Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

    Shackleton Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Denny Z.H. Levett
    Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom

    Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Michael P.W. Grocott
    Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom

    Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Anesthesiology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Healy M.A.
        • Mullard A.J.
        • Campbell Jr., D.A.
        • et al.
        Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications.
        JAMA Surg. 2016; 151: 823-830
        • Moonesinghe S.R.
        • Harris S.
        • Mythen M.G.
        • et al.
        Survival after postoperative morbidity: a longitudinal observational cohort study.
        Br J Anaesth. 2014; 113: 977-984
        • Grocott M.P.W.
        • Plumb J.O.M.
        • Edwards M.
        • et al.
        Re-designing the pathway to surgery: better care and added value.
        Perioper Med (Lond). 2017; 6: 9
        • Horowitz M.
        • Neeman E.
        • Sharon E.
        • et al.
        Exploiting the critical perioperative period to improve long-term cancer outcomes.
        Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015; 12: 213-226
        • Moonesinghe S.R.
        • Mythen M.G.
        • Das P.
        • et al.
        Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major surgery: qualitative systematic review.
        Anesthesiology. 2013; 119: 959-981
        • Saklad M.
        Grading of patients for surgical procedures.
        Anesthesiology. 1941; 2: 281-284
        • Koo C.Y.
        • Hyder J.A.
        • Wanderer J.P.
        • et al.
        A meta-analysis of the predictive accuracy of postoperative mortality using the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system.
        World J Surg. 2015; 39: 88-103
        • Wolters U.
        • Wolf T.
        • Stützer H.
        • et al.
        Risk factors, complications, and outcome in surgery: a multivariate analysis.
        Eur J Surg. 1997; 163: 563-568
        • Haynes S.R.
        • Lawler P.G.
        An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation.
        Anaesthesia. 1995; 50: 195-199
        • Grocott M.P.
        • Levett D.Z.
        • Matejowsky C.
        • et al.
        ASA scores in the preoperative patient: feedback to clinicians can improve data quality.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2007; 13: 318-319
        • Copeland G.P.
        • Jones D.
        • Walters M.
        POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit.
        Br J Surg. 1991; 78: 355-360
        • Prytherch D.R.
        • Whiteley M.S.
        • Higgins B.
        • et al.
        POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.
        Br J Surg. 1998; 85: 1217-1220
        • Tekkis P.P.
        • Prytherch D.R.
        • Kocher H.M.
        • et al.
        Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM).
        Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 1174-1182
        • Tekkis P.P.
        • McCulloch P.
        • Poloniecki J.D.
        • et al.
        Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUM.
        Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 288-295
        • Lagarde S.M.
        • Maris A.K.
        • de Castro S.M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of O-POSSUM in predicting in-hospital mortality after resection for oesophageal cancer.
        Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 1521-1526
        • Bosch D.J.
        • Pultrum B.B.
        • de Bock G.H.
        • et al.
        Comparison of different risk-adjustment models in assessing short-term surgical outcome after transthoracic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.
        Am J Surg. 2011; 202: 303-309
        • Lai F.
        • Kwan T.L.
        • Yuen W.C.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of various POSSUM models for predicting mortality in patients undergoing elective oesophagectomy for carcinoma.
        Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 1172-1178
        • Protopapa K.L.
        • Simpson J.C.
        • Smith N.C.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT).
        Br J Surg. 2014; 101: 1774-1783
        • Wong D.J.N.
        • Harris S.
        • Sahni A.
        • et al.
        Developing and validating subjective and objective risk-assessment measures for predicting mortality after major surgery: an international prospective cohort study.
        PLoS Med. 2020; 17: e1003253
      1. Preoperative assessment and optimisation for adult surgery including consideration of COVID-19 and its implications.
        (Available at:) (Accessed November 12, 2021)
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Daley J.
        • Henderson W.
        • et al.
        The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
        Ann Surg. 1998; 228: 491-507
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Liu Y.
        • Paruch J.L.
        • et al.
        Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 833-842.e1-3
        • Ingraham A.M.
        • Richards K.E.
        • Hall B.L.
        • et al.
        Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach.
        Adv Surg. 2010; 44: 251-267
        • Botto F.
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • Chan M.T.
        • et al.
        Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes.
        Anesthesiology. 2014; 120: 564-578
        • Glance L.G.
        • Lustik S.J.
        • Hannan E.L.
        • et al.
        The surgical mortality probability model: derivation and validation of a simple risk prediction rule for noncardiac surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 696-702
        • Goldman L.
        • Caldera D.L.
        • Nussbaum S.R.
        • et al.
        Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures.
        N Engl J Med. 1977; 297: 845-850
        • Detsky A.S.
        • Abrams H.B.
        • McLaughlin J.R.
        • et al.
        Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
        J Gen Intern Med. 1986; 1: 211-219
        • Lee T.H.
        • Marcantonio E.R.
        • Mangione C.M.
        • et al.
        Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.
        Circulation. 1999; 100: 1043-1049
        • Duceppe E.
        • Parlow J.
        • MacDonald P.
        • et al.
        Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management for patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
        Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33: 17-32
        • Devereaux P.J.
        • Bradley D.
        • Chan M.T.
        • et al.
        • VISION Pilot Study Investigators
        An international prospective cohort study evaluating major vascular complications among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: the VISION Pilot Study.
        Open Med. 2011; 5: e193-e200
        • Gupta P.K.
        • Gupta H.
        • Sundaram A.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery.
        Circulation. 2011; 124: 381-387
        • Kristensen S.D.
        • Knuuti J.
        New ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management.
        Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2344-2345
        • Arena R.
        • Myers J.
        • Williams M.A.
        • et al.
        Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing.
        Circulation. 2007; 116: 329-343
        • Pritchard A.
        • Burns P.
        • Correia J.
        • et al.
        ARTP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing 2021.
        BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021; 8: e001121
        • Goodyear S.J.
        • Yow H.
        • Saedon M.
        • et al.
        Risk stratification by pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing improves outcomes following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a cohort study.
        Perioper Med (Lond). 2013; 2: 10
        • American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians
        ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 167: 211-277
        • Levett D.Z.H.
        • Jack S.
        • Swart M.
        • et al.
        Perioperative Exercise Testing and Training Society (POETTS). Perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET): consensus clinical guidelines on indications, organization, conduct, and physiological interpretation.
        Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120: 484-500
        • Older P.
        • Smith R.
        • Courtney P.
        • et al.
        Preoperative evaluation of cardiac failure and ischemia in elderly patients by cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
        Chest. 1993; 104: 701-704
        • Otto J.M.
        • Levett D.Z.H.
        • Grocott M.P.W.
        Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for preoperative evaluation: what does the future hold?.
        Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2020; 10: 1-11
        • Older P.O.
        • Levett D.Z.H.
        Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and surgery.
        Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017; 14: S74-S83
        • Reeves T.
        • Bates S.
        • Sharp T.
        • et al.
        Perioperative Exercise Testing and Training Society (POETTS). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in the United Kingdom-a national survey of the structure, conduct, interpretation and funding.
        Perioper Med (Lond). 2018; 7: 2
        • Snowden C.P.
        • Prentis J.M.
        • Anderson H.L.
        • et al.
        Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts complications and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing major elective surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 535-541
        • Wijeysundera D.N.
        • Pearse R.M.
        • Shulman M.A.
        • et al.
        Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 2631-2640
        • de Souto Barreto P.
        • Ferrandez A.M.
        • Saliba-Serre B.
        Are older adults who volunteer to participate in an exercise study fitter and healthier than nonvolunteers? The participation bias of the study population.
        J Phys Act Health. 2013; 10: 359-367
        • Solway S.
        • Brooks D.
        • Lacasse Y.
        • et al.
        A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain.
        Chest. 2001; 119: 256-270
        • ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories
        ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166: 111-117
        • Moran J.
        • Wilson F.
        • Guinan E.
        • et al.
        The preoperative use of field tests of exercise tolerance to predict postoperative outcome in intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review.
        J Clin Anesth. 2016; 35: 446-455
        • Sinclair R.C.
        • Batterham A.M.
        • Davies S.
        • et al.
        Validity of the 6 min walk test in prediction of the anaerobic threshold before major non-cardiac surgery.
        Br J Anaesth. 2012; 108: 30-35
        • Ramos R.J.
        • Ladha K.S.
        • Cuthbertson B.H.
        • et al.
        Association of six-minute walk test distance with postoperative complications in non-cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort study.
        Can J Anaesth. 2021; 68: 514-529
        • Holland A.E.
        • Spruit M.A.
        • Troosters T.
        • et al.
        An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease.
        Eur Respir J. 2014; 44: 1428-1446
        • Struthers R.
        • Erasmus P.
        • Holmes K.
        • et al.
        Assessing fitness for surgery: a comparison of questionnaire, incremental shuttle walk, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in general surgical patients.
        Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101: 774-780
        • Podsiadlo D.
        • Richardson S.
        The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39: 142-148
        • Huisman M.G.
        • van Leeuwen B.L.
        • Ugolini G.
        • et al.
        Timed Up & Go": a screening tool for predicting 30-day morbidity in onco-geriatric surgical patients? A multicenter cohort study.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9: e86863
        • Wilson A.
        • Ronnekleiv-Kelly S.M.
        • Pawlik T.M.
        Regret in surgical decision making: a systematic review of patient and physician perspectives.
        World J Surg. 2017; 41: 1454-1465
      2. Centre for Perioperative Care. Shared decision making.
        (Available at:) (Accessed November 29, 2021)
        • Santhirapala R.
        • Fleisher L.A.
        • Grocott M.P.W.
        Choosing wisely: just because we can, does it mean we should?.
        Br J Anaesth. 2019; 122: 306-310
        • Elwyn G.
        • Durand M.A.
        • Song J.
        • et al.
        A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process.
        BMJ. 2017; 359: j4891
        • Elwyn G.
        • Lloyd A.
        • May C.
        • et al.
        Collaborative deliberation: a model for patient care.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 97: 158-164
        • Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
        An introduction to patient decision aids.
        BMJ. 2013; 347: f4147
        • International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS)
        What are patient decision aids?.
        (Available at:) (Accessed November 29, 2021)
        • Stacey D.
        • Légaré F.
        • Lewis K.
        • et al.
        Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 4: CD001431
        • NHS England and NHS Improvement
        Shared decision making summary guide.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 12, 2021)
        • OSIRIS
        Optimising Shared decision-makIng for high-RIsk major Surgery.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 15, 2021)
        • Shaw S.
        • Hughes G.
        • Stephens T.
        • et al.
        Understanding decision making about major surgery: protocol for a qualitative study of shared decision making by high-risk patients and their clinical teams.
        BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e033703
        • Barnett K.
        • Mercer S.W.
        • Norbury M.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 37-43
        • International Diabetes Federation
        IDF diabetes atlas.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 7, 2021)
        • Rotruck L.S.
        • Suszan L.L.
        • Vigersky R.
        • et al.
        Should continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pumps be used during the perioperative period? Development of a clinical decision algorithm.
        AANA J. 2018; 86: 194-200
        • Sampson M.J.
        • Dozio N.
        • Ferguson B.
        • et al.
        Total and excess bed occupancy by age, specialty and insulin use for nearly one million diabetes patients discharged from all English acute hospitals.
        Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007; 77: 92-98
        • Holman N.
        • Hillson R.
        • Young R.J.
        Excess mortality during hospital stays among patients with recorded diabetes compared with those without diabetes.
        Diabet Med. 2013; 30: 1393-1402
        • Yong P.H.
        • Weinberg L.
        • Torkamani N.
        • et al.
        The presence of diabetes and higher HBA1c are independently associated with adverse outcomes after surgery.
        Diabetes Care. 2018; 41: 1172-1179
        • Frisch A.
        • Chandra P.
        • Smiley D.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and clinical outcome of hyperglycemia in the perioperative period in noncardiac surgery.
        Diabetes Care. 2010; 33: 1783-1788
        • Kotagal M.
        • Symons R.G.
        • Hirsch I.B.
        • et al.
        Perioperative hyperglycemia and risk of adverse events among patients with and without diabetes.
        Ann Surg. 2015; 261: 97-103
        • World Health Organization
        Classification of diabetes mellitus.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 7, 2021)
        • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
        Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 8, 2021)
        • Dhatariya K.K.
        • Wiles M.D.
        Pre-operative testing guidelines: a NICE try but not enough.
        Anaesthesia. 2016; 71: 1403-1407
      3. Guideline for perioperative care for people with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective and emergency surgery guideline for perioperative care for people with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective and emergency surgery.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 8, 2021)
        • Dhatariya K.
        • Levy N.
        • Kilvert A.
        • et al.
        NHS diabetes guideline for the perioperative management of the adult patient with diabetes.
        Diabet Med. 2012; 29: 420-433
        • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
        Type 2 diabetes in adults: management.
        (2021. Available at:) (Accessed December 7, 2021)
        • Fowler A.J.
        • Ahmad T.
        • Phull M.K.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of the association between preoperative anaemia and mortality after surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2015; 102: 1314-1324
        • Musallam K.M.
        • Tamim H.M.
        • Richards T.
        • et al.
        Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
        Lancet. 2011; 378: 1396-1407
        • Baron D.M.
        • Hochrieser H.
        • Posch M.
        • et al.
        Preoperative anaemia is associated with poor clinical outcome in non-cardiac surgery patients.
        Br J Anaesth. 2014; 113: 416-423
        • World Health Organization
        Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 8, 2021)
        • Butcher A.
        • Richards T.
        • Stanworth S.J.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic criteria for pre-operative anaemia-time to end sex discrimination.
        Anaesthesia. 2017; 72: 811-814
        • Munting K.E.
        • Klein A.A.
        Optimisation of pre-operative anaemia in patients before elective major surgery - why, who, when and how?.
        Anaesthesia. 2019; 74: 49-57
        • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
        Blood transfusion quality standard.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 2, 2021)
        • Muñoz M.
        • Acheson A.G.
        • Auerbach M.
        • et al.
        International consensus statement on the peri-operative management of anaemia and iron deficiency.
        Anaesthesia. 2017; 72: 233-247
        • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
        Blood transfusion.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 2, 2021)
        • Ng O.
        • Keeler B.D.
        • Mishra A.
        • et al.
        Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 12: CD011588
        • Richards T.
        • Baikady R.R.
        • Clevenger B.
        • et al.
        Preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia before major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT): a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2020; 396: 1353-1361
        • British Geriatric Society
        Introduction to frailty, fit for frailty part 1.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 9, 2021)
        • Lin H.S.
        • Watts J.N.
        • Peel N.M.
        • et al.
        Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review.
        BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16: 157
        • Simon H.L.
        • Reif de Paula T.
        • Profeta da Luz M.M.
        • et al.
        Frailty in older patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery: USA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.
        Br J Surg. 2020; 107: 1363-1371
        • Oakland K.
        • Nadler R.
        • Cresswell L.
        • et al.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between frailty and outcome in surgical patients.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016; 98: 80-85
        • Makary M.A.
        • Segev D.L.
        • Pronovost P.J.
        • et al.
        Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 901-908
        • Bougeard A.M.
        • Brent A.
        • Swart M.
        • et al.
        A survey of UK peri-operative medicine: pre-operative care.
        Anaesthesia. 2017; 72: 1010-1015
        • Fried L.P.
        • Tangen C.M.
        • Walston J.
        • et al.
        Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56: M146-M156
        • Rockwood K.
        • Song X.
        • MacKnight C.
        • et al.
        A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.
        CMAJ. 2005; 173: 489-495
        • Rolfson D.B.
        • Majumdar S.R.
        • Tsuyuki R.T.
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale.
        Age Ageing. 2006; 35: 526-529
      4. Guideline for perioperative care for people living with frailty undergoing elective and emergency surgery.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 9, 2021)
        • British Geriatric Society
        Comprehensive geriatric assessment toolkit for primary care practitioners.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 9, 2021)
        • Joughin A.L.
        • Partridge J.S.L.
        • O'Halloran T.
        • et al.
        Where are we now in perioperative medicine? Results from a repeated UK survey of geriatric medicine delivered services for older people.
        Age Ageing. 2019; 48: 458-462
        • Partridge J.
        • Sbai M.
        • Dhesi J.
        Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery.
        Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018; 30: 253-257
        • Thu K.
        • Nguyen H.P.T.
        • Gogulan T.
        • et al.
        Care of older people in surgery for general surgery: a single centre experience.
        ANZ J Surg. 2021; 91: 890-895
        • Shipway D.
        • Koizia L.
        • Winterkorn N.
        • et al.
        Embedded geriatric surgical liaison is associated with reduced inpatient length of stay in older patients admitted for gastrointestinal surgery.
        Future Healthc J. 2018; 5: 108-116
        • Eamer G.
        • Saravana-Bawan B.
        • van der Westhuizen B.
        • et al.
        Economic evaluations of comprehensive geriatric assessment in surgical patients: a systematic review.
        J Surg Res. 2017; 218: 9-17
        • Carli F.
        • Zavorsky G.S.
        Optimizing functional exercise capacity in the elderly surgical population.
        Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005; 8: 23-32
        • Silver J.K.
        • Baima J.
        Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 92: 715-727
        • Barberan-Garcia A.
        • Ubré M.
        • Roca J.
        • et al.
        Personalised prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded controlled trial.
        Ann Surg. 2018; 267: 50-56
        • Gillis C.
        • Li C.
        • Lee L.
        • et al.
        Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.
        Anesthesiology. 2014; 121: 937-947
        • Dunne D.F.
        • Jack S.
        • Jones R.P.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection.
        Br J Surg. 2016; 103: 504-512
        • Minnella E.M.
        • Awasthi R.
        • Loiselle S.E.
        • et al.
        Effect of exercise and nutrition prehabilitation on functional capacity in esophagogastric cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 1081-1089
        • Waterland J.L.
        • McCourt O.
        • Edbrooke L.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of prehabilitation including exercise on postoperative outcomes following abdominal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Front Surg. 2021; 8: 628848
        • Lambert J.E.
        • Hayes L.D.
        • Keegan T.J.
        • et al.
        The impact of prehabilitation on patient outcomes in hepatobiliary, colorectal, and upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a PRISMA-Accordant Meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg. 2021; 274: 70-77
        • West M.A.
        • Wischmeyer P.E.
        • Grocott M.P.W.
        Prehabilitation and nutritional support to improve perioperative outcomes.
        Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2017; 7: 340-349
        • Carli F.
        • Scheede-Bergdahl C.
        Prehabilitation to enhance perioperative care.
        Anesthesiol Clin. 2015; 33: 17-33
        • Gillis C.
        • Buhler K.
        • Bresee L.
        • et al.
        Effects of nutritional prehabilitation, with and without exercise, on outcomes of patients who undergo colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 155: 391-410
        • Ferreira V.
        • Lawson C.
        • Ekmekjian T.
        • et al.
        Effects of preoperative nutrition and multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and postoperative complications in surgical lung cancer patients: a systematic review.
        Support Care Cancer. 2021; 29: 5597-5610
        • Levett D.Z.H.
        • Grimmett C.
        Psychological factors, prehabilitation and surgical outcomes: evidence and future directions.
        Anaesthesia. 2019; 74: 36-42
        • Tsimopoulou I.
        • Pasquali S.
        • Howard R.
        • et al.
        Psychological prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a systematic review.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 4117-4123
        • Li C.
        • Carli F.
        • Lee L.
        • et al.
        Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 1072-1082
        • Bousquet-Dion G.
        • Awasthi R.
        • Loiselle S.È.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of supervised multimodal prehabilitation programme in cancer patients undergoing colorectal resection: a randomized control trial.
        Acta Oncol. 2018; 57: 849-859
      5. Macmillan cancer support. Prehabilitation for people with cancer.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 6, 2021)
      6. UK Government, smoking and tobacco: applying all our health.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 9, 2021)
        • Center for Disease Control and Prevention
        Smoking & tobacco use. Fast facts.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 9, 2021)
        • Shi Y.
        • Warner D.O.
        Surgery as a teachable moment for smoking cessation.
        Anesthesiology. 2010; 112: 102-107
        • Møller A.
        • Tønnesen H.
        Risk reduction: perioperative smoking intervention.
        Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006; 20: 237-248
        • Grønkjær M.
        • Eliasen M.
        • Skov-Ettrup L.S.
        • et al.
        Preoperative smoking status and postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg. 2014; 259: 52-71
        • Zaki A.
        • Abrishami A.
        • Wong J.
        • et al.
        Interventions in the preoperative clinic for long term smoking cessation: a quantitative systematic review.
        Can J Anaesth. 2008; 55: 11-21
        • Thomsen T.
        • Villebro N.
        • Møller A.M.
        Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2014: CD002294
        • Nolan M.B.
        • Warner D.O.
        Safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the perioperative period: a narrative review.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90: 1553-1561
        • Wong J.
        • Abrishami A.
        • Yang Y.
        • et al.
        A perioperative smoking cessation intervention with varenicline: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
        Anesthesiology. 2012; 117: 755-764
        • World Health Organization
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 10, 2021)
        • UK Government
        The public health burden of alcohol: evidence review.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 10, 2021)
        • Nath B.
        • Li Y.
        • Carroll J.E.
        • et al.
        Alcohol exposure as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in elective surgery.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2010; 14: 1732-1741
        • UK Department of Health
        UK chief medical officers’ low risk drinking guidelines.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 10, 2021)
        • Egholm J.W.
        • Pedersen B.
        • Møller A.M.
        • et al.
        Perioperative alcohol cessation intervention for postoperative complications.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 11: CD008343
        • Bush K.
        • Kivlahan D.R.
        • McDonell M.B.
        • et al.
        The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol use disorders identification test.
        Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158: 1789-1795
        • Gambus P.
        • Shafer S.L.
        Artificial intelligence for everyone.
        Anesthesiology. 2018; 128: 431-433
        • Char D.S.
        • Burgart A.
        Machine-learning implementation in clinical anesthesia: opportunities and challenges.
        Anesth Analg. 2020; 130: 1709-1712
        • IBM Cloud Learn Hubs
        What are neural networks?.
        (Available at:) (Accessed December 10, 2021)
        • Davies S.J.
        • Vistisen S.T.
        • Jian Z.
        • et al.
        Ability of an arterial waveform analysis-derived hypotension prediction index to predict future hypotensive events in surgical patients.
        Anesth Analg. 2020; 130: 352-359
        • Lee H.C.
        • Ryu H.G.
        • Chung E.J.
        • et al.
        Prediction of bispectral index during target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil: a deep learning approach.
        Anesthesiology. 2018; 128: 492-501
        • Mück J.E.
        • Ünal B.
        • Butt H.
        • et al.
        Market and patent analyses of wearables in medicine.
        Trends Biotechnol. 2019; 37: 563-566
        • Hedrick T.L.
        • Hassinger T.E.
        • Myers E.
        • et al.
        Wearable technology in the perioperative period: predicting risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63: 538-544
        • Cos H.
        • Li D.
        • Williams G.
        • et al.
        Predicting outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatectomy using wearable technology and machine learning: prospective cohort study.
        J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23: e23595
        • Bloomfield R.A.
        • Broberg J.S.
        • Williams H.A.
        • et al.
        Machine learning and wearable sensors at preoperative assessments: functional recovery prediction to set realistic expectations for knee replacements.
        Med Eng Phys. 2021; 89: 14-21
        • Jones L.
        • Tan L.
        • Carey-Jones S.
        • et al.
        Can wearable technology be used to approximate cardiopulmonary exercise testing metrics?.
        Perioper Med (Lond). 2021; 10: 9
        • Fritz B.A.
        • Cui Z.
        • Zhang M.
        • et al.
        Deep-learning model for predicting 30-day postoperative mortality.
        Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123: 688-695
        • Hill B.L.
        • Brown R.
        • Gabel E.
        • et al.
        An automated machine learning-based model predicts postoperative mortality using readily-extractable preoperative electronic health record data.
        Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123: 877-886
        • COVIDSurg Collaborative
        Machine learning risk prediction of mortality for patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2: the COVIDSurg mortality score.
        Br J Surg. 2021; 108: 1274-1292