Anaesthesia for Pancreatic Surgery

References

1. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/. Accessed September 26, 2020

   View in Article

   • Google Scholar

2. Available at: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/ Accessed September 26, 2020

   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Tempero M.A.
   • Malafa M.P.
   • Al-Hawary M.
   • et al.
   Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
   J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017; 15: 1028-1061
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Whipple A.O.
   • Parsons W.B.
   • Mullins C.R.
   • et al.
   Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.
   Ann Surg. 1935; 102: 763-779
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Stojadinovic A.
   • Brooks A.
   • Hoos A.
   • et al.
   An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
   J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196: 954-964
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Ho C.K.
   • Kleeff J.
   • Friess H.
   • et al.
   Complications of pancreatic surgery.
   HPB (Oxford). 2005; 7: 99-108
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Fernandez-del Castillo C.
   • Morales-Oyarvide V.
   • McGrath D.
   • et al.
   Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital.
   Surgery. 2012; 152: S56-S63
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Kumar S.V.
   • Prasad J.S.
   A Postoperative morbidity following Whipple’s procedure for periampullary carcinoma: a retrospective study spanning 5 years.
   Int J Res Med Sci. 2019; 7: 4314-4319
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Traverso L.W.
   • Longmire Jr., W.P.
   Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a follow-up evaluation.
   Ann Surg. 1980; 192: 306-310
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Tran K.
    • Smeenk H.
    • Eijck C.
    • et al.
    Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard whipple procedure.
    Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 738-745
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Hüttner F.J.
    • Fitzmaurice C.
    • Schwarzer G.
    • et al.
    Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2: CD006053
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Wang S.
    • Shi N.
    • You L.
    • et al.
    Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96: e8619
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Zhang H.
    • Lan X.
    • Peng B.
    • et al.
    Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
    World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25: 5711-5731
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Peng L.
    • Lin S.
    • Li Y.
    • et al.
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 3085-3097https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5371-2
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. Further evidence of effective adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group.
    Cancer. 1987; 59: 2006-2010
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Motoi F.
    • Unno M.
    Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020; 50: 483-489
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Papalezova K.T.
    • Tyler D.S.
    • Blazer 3rd, D.G.
    • et al.
    Does preoperative therapy optimize outcomes in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer?.
    J Surg Oncol. 2012; 106: 111-118
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Liu W.
    • Fu X.L.
    • Yang J.Y.
    • et al.
    Efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: e3009
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Cools K.S.
    • Sanoff H.K.
    • Kim H.J.
    • et al.
    Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018; 118: 455-462
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Hennis P.J.
    • Meale P.M.
    Grocott MPWCardiopulmonary exercise testing for the evaluation of perioperative risk in non-cardiopulmonary surgery.
    Postgrad Med J. 2011; 87: 550-557
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Junejo M.A.
    • Mason J.M.
    • Sheen A.J.
    • et al.
    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for preoperative risk assessment before pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer.
    Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21: 1929-1936
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Nygren J.
    • Thorell A.
    • Ljungqvist O.
    New developments facilitating nutritional intake after gastrointestinal surgery.
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003; 6: 593-597
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Goonetilleke K.S.
    • Siriwardena A.K.
    Systematic review of peri-operative nutritional supplementation in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    JOP. 2006; 7: 5-13
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Lassen K.
    • Coolsen M.M.
    • Slim K.
    • et al.
    Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.
    World J Surg. 2013; 37: 240-258
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Fang Y.
    • Gurusamy K.S.
    • Wang Q.
    • et al.
    Pre-operative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 9: CD005444
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Lynskey G.E.
    • Banovac F.
    • Chang T.
    Vascular complications associated with percutaneous biliary drainage: a report of three cases.
    Semin Intervent Radiol. 2007; 24: 316-319
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Rawlinson A.
    • Kang P.
    • Evans J.
    • et al.
    A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011; 93: 583-588
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Elsarrag M.
    • Soldozy S.
    • Patel P.
    • et al.
    Enhanced recovery after spine surgery: a systematic review.
    Neurosurg Focus. 2019; 46: E3
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Zhu S.
    • Qian W.
    • Jiang C.
    • et al.
    Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Postgrad Med J. 2017; 93: 736-742
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Scheib S.A.
    • Thomassee M.
    • Kenner J.L.
    Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Gynecology: A Review of the Literature.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26: 327-343
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Spelt L.
    • Ansari D.
    • Sturesson C.
    • et al.
    Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand?.
    HPB (Oxford). 2011; 13: 833-838
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Hall T.C.
    • Dennison A.R.
    • Bilku D.K.
    • et al.
    Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012; 94: 318-326
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Coolsen M.M.E.
    • van Dam R.M.
    • van der Wilt A.A.
    • et al.
    Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Pancreatic Surgery with Particular Emphasis on Pancreaticoduodenectomies.
    World J Surg. 2013; 37: 1909-1918
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Kagedan D.J.
    • Ahmed M.
    • Devitt K.S.
    • et al.
    Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence.
    HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17: 11-16
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Mahvi D.A.
    • Pak L.M.
    • Bose S.K.
    • et al.
    Fast-Track Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Factors Associated with Early Discharge.
    World J Surg. 2019; 43: 1332-1341
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Pearse R.M.
    • Harrison D.A.
    • MacDonald N.
    • et al.
    Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review.
    JAMA. 2014; 311 ([published correction appears in JAMA. 2014 Oct 8;312(14):1473]): 2181-2190
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Punjasawadwong Y.
    • Phongchiewboon A.
    • Bunchungmongkol N.
    Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2014: CD003843
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Radtke F.M.
    • Franck M.
    • Lendner J.
    • et al.
    Monitoring depth of anaesthesia in a randomized trial decreases the rate of postoperative delirium but not postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
    Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110: i98-i105
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Wright G.P.
    • Koehler T.J.
    • Davis A.T.
    • et al.
    The drowning whipple: Perioperative fluid balance and outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110: 407-411
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Pratt W.B.
    • Steinbrook R.A.
    • Maithel S.K.
    • et al.
    Epidural analgesia for pancreatoduodenectomy: a critical appraisal.
    J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12: 1207-1220https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0467-1
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Hermanides J.
    • Hollmann M.W.
    • Stevens M.F.
    • et al.
    Failed epidural: causes and management.
    Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109: 144-154
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Wente M.N.
    • Bassi C.
    • Dervenis C.
    • et al.
    Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).
    Surgery. 2007; 142: 761-768
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Cullen J.
    • Sarr M.
    • Ilstrup D.
    Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Incidence, significance, and management.
    Am J Surg. 1994; 168: 295-298
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • American Gastroenterological Association
    American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Gastroenterology. 1999; 117: 1463-1484
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar